Category: Secularism

Downright abysmal and gradually deteriorating

Posted by Angie on Tue 6-Feb-2007 at 12:00 pm

Bill Muehlenberg is becoming more and more disenchanted with the state of the ‘Christian West’:

… [M]ost Westerners have for too long now been strung out on the narcotic of social welfarism and cradle-to-grave statism that they have nothing left to live for or die for … All we seem to want is our internet porn and 30-hour work week …[We are] bloated, blind and balding …

Muslims really do not need to terrorise their way into hegemony, they are already achieving it by enjoying sex. We on the other hand are aborting ourselves into extinction.

(more…)

Barney Zwartz and religious violence

Posted by Brian on Sat 24-Jun-2006 at 6:30 pm

The Australian National Secular Association in association with the Rationalist and Humanist Societies ran a very successful conference in Melbourne last weekend. The topic was ‘Keeping God out of Government’ and among the participants was one Barney Zwartz. Zwartz, a conservative Presbyterian who doubles as religion editor of the Melbourne Age, told us a few ‘home truths’ the most coherent of which seemed to be that, like Christianity and Islam, we had our fair share of ‘fundamentalists’.

I don’t think this is right. A central feature - I think the central feature - of humanism, rationalism and freethinking (I don’t know about ’secularism’, often used as a comprehensive political swear-word by people like Zwartz) is the provisional nature of knowledge, and I mean all knowledge. The only thing I’m pretty sure of is that I’m not sure of anything - and I’m not even quite sure of that. To characterise this as a species of fundamentalism - to class it with Christian and Muslim fundamentalisms - is to deprive the term of meaning.

(more…)

Secular Society works best

Posted by Bronny on Mon 17-Apr-2006 at 10:30 pm

A common theme amongst religious Right groups in Australia is that the secular society that exists in Australia today is filled with evil and that society must change so that it more closely resembles a Bible-based worldview, whatever that may mean.

Now religious extremists are never shy when it comes to self-righteousness and moral superiority, but do their assertions stand up to scrutiny? The dreadful decline in American politics and society since it lurched to the right in recent years has given many writers cause to question the merits of faith-based politics, or indeed of a society built on so-called Christian faith.

(more…)

The secular trap

Posted by Brian on Fri 13-May-2005 at 4:27 pm

Andrew Lansdown of Life Ministries WA is a prolific writer on topics of interest to the Religious Right. He has some strange ideas (for example, he believes that animals are morally responsible for their actions - Salt Shakers Journal, Feb. 2001, 13), but he is generally orthodox in his interpretations of the scriptures. I was surprised, therefore, when I came across this paragraph in a recent article he wrote called ‘Arguments against abortion’ (New Life, 28 Apr. 2005, 5):

Every human being has a right to life. This includes, of course, pregnant women. Consequently, on the exceptionally rare occasion when a woman is in mortal danger from the continuation of a pregnancy, her life cannot be forfeited against her will for the sake of the baby’s. Where there is a genuine conflict between the right to life of the child and the right to life of the mother it is legitimate to choose in favour of the mother.

(more…)